ID predicts... again...
scordova at uncommondescent has a post (11 Apr, 2007) where it is yet again claimed that ID predicts that "junk" DNA should not be junk, but actually have functionality. The quote is from ID supporter Andras Pellionisz (a published scientist, no less) who says:
Most Darwinists erroneously predicted that 98.7% of the DNA was devoid of function (“junk”), while the ID/ET theory correctly predicted some yet to be decoded function of junkDNA.
Why is it that ID proponents don't understand their own theory? Intelligent design theory does NOT predict this! Some ID supporters might have claimed to have predicted this (or more likely, postdicted), but ID does NOT - and I repeat NOT - predict this.