Luskin is SO predictable!
Duracell bunny. Broken record. Bushism. Some things just never stop going on and on. Yet again, we have Casey Luskin claiming that ID predicts something about junk DNA:
Science wouldn't publish his letter, but it now appears that another prediction of intelligent design has been validated.As I've stated numerous times, intelligent design "theory" is incapable of making predictions. Even William Dembski thinks so:
Yes, intelligent design concedes predictability.Perhaps Luskin didn't get the memo?
Edited to add: John Pieret at "Thoughts in a Haystack" still has the energy to explain in detail what is wrong with Luskin's claim.